새로운 구상과 방법론 -다이어그램 (들뢰즈, 웅거)

Gilles Deleuze’s “Difference and Repetition”: A Critical Introduction and Guide?, James Williams

들뢰즈의 차이와 반복 – 해설과 비판, 제임스 윌리엄스

들뢰즈의 차이와 반복

dominant ‘image of thought’ 1. to think philosophically presupposes a good will on the part of the thinker 2. thought is good 3. there is a common sense that crosses between faculties (recognition) 4. there is a good sense that crosses between thinkers (a shared sense of good and bad, better and worse) 5. recognition depends on representation (identity in the concept, analogy in judgement, oppositions in imagination, similarities in perception) 6. error is a case of false recognition 7. problems have solutions 8. knowledge is the goal of learning
Deleuze’s responses and objections 1. all thinkers bring conflicting desires, ideal genealogies and sensations to thought 2. thought is always accompanied by a chaotic creative and destructive background 3. faculties evolve through their differences and they cannot be recognised 4. thinkers cannot divest themselves of their individuating differences and good sense is therefore an illusion 5. the dependence on representation is an illegitimate covering up of underlying pure differences and repetitions of those differences 6. error comes from the struggle of thought with its chaotic background 7. problems can only be transformed to make an individual life viable 8. learning is the goal of learning

로베르토 웅거의 정치세계

웅거 프로그램적 대안 웅거 진보적 다두제의 국가사회관계론 프로그램적 대안 진보적 다두제의 국가사회관계론

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s